Blog of the [Undefined Time-Unit]

April 1, 2005

Introducing Mixing Memory, a blog of a very dear friend whom I’ve known for my whole some random stranger I found by clicking around a lot, who specializes in cognitive psychology.

Brief Review:
His writing is refreshingly lucid, and consistently fascinating. He evidently likes a good debate, and although he has some quite definite opinions on things (and stuff, even!), he seems to be fairly respectful in engaging opposing arguments and trying to do them justice before skewering them to a fine crisp.

Plus, his discussions are well-cited and frequently bring up interesting research findings.

As can be seen in the post linked above, on the use of analogies in politics.

And yes he is aware that the name George Lakoff rings a bell– but, having some background in a related field, he brings up some interesting research that helps ring it even better.

Now go forth and discover.

.

Once you think about it, my “bell” reference is a completely nonsensical mismatch of meaning, so let’s just pretend it was written for aesthetic symmetry rather than say, actual coherence… (Which, pretty evidently, it was)

Darwin Was Just This Guy, You Know?

The editors of Scientific American announce: “Get ready for a new Scientific American”. From now on, they will only cover science, and will not address political issues or science policy. They`ve also proclaimed a commitment to provide “fair and balanced” coverage of scientific ideas, which naturally will include articles on both sides of the debate surrounding evolution:

“In retrospect, this magazine’s coverage of so-called evolution has been hideously one-sided. For decades, we published articles in every issue that endorsed the ideas of Charles Darwin and his cronies… Moreover, we shamefully mistreated the Intelligent Design (ID) theorists by lumping them in with creationists… We owe it to our readers to present everybody’s ideas equally and not to ignore or discredit theories simply because they lack scientifically credible arguments or facts. Nor should we succumb to the easy mistake of thinking that scientists understand their fields better than, say, U.S. senators or best-selling novelists do.”

Read
the full editorial
.

[And guess what day this grand makeover will go into effect?]

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here